Wahhabism: Religious deviance and fountainhead of radicalism & extremism
Muslims are caught in the eye of a ferocious storm as Islamic State’s legions spread fear across three continents. But anger has been misplaced as the real face of terror lies not with Islam but hidden in Saudi Arabia, where Wahhabism reigns all powerful.
If the world ever needed a reminder that terror truly stands as
an enemy of civilization and of all people - beyond class,
faiths, ethnicity and political affiliation - the triple attacks
this week by extremists in Lyon (France), Sousse (Tunisia) and
Kuwait should stand as testimony to the evil that has besieged us
all.
Western politicians will likely exploit France's attack to push
forth their own security agenda, calling on the Western world to
fear and abhor Muslims as they themselves plot to encroach
further on civil liberties and trample over human rights.
However, many will fail to recognize where the true monster
really lies.
To reduce the world's terror crisis to Islam on account of a few
twisted and psychotic individuals, who have decided to brand
themselves Muslims, is as ridiculous as blaming the Bible or the
whole of Christianity on the abuses of the Spanish Inquisition.
There are over one billion Muslims in the world, of which less
than half a percent have pledged themselves to the black flag of
Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL). Branding 23 percent of
the world’s population as religious criminals is a rationale of
discrimination and prejudice that terror ideologues have used to
build their army - exclusion is an epidemic which has cost the
world too much blood already for it to be allowed to perpetuate.
READ MORE: France terrorist attack suspect took selfie with beheading victim
Historically, men have long abused the name of God and religion
to serve their own selfish goals, claiming holiness as a shield
against criticism while perverting the Holy Scriptures to
brainwash communities into absolute submission. Where religion
offers freedom, bigotry has only ever enslaved and abused.
Islam, like Judaism and Christianity before it, carries a message
of peace and compassion. How people choose to interpret it takes
nothing away from its message; if anything it says more about our
ability, or rather inability as a people to respect the sanctity
of faith.
If religions are a reflection of the divine, our practice of it
has proven to be inherently flawed, which has led to fanatics
using God to breed dogmatism.
This terror we have labeled as Islamic radicalism could not be
further remote from Islam. Everything IS and its infernal sisters
perpetrate, from the promises of bloody retributions to its
militants' heinous crimes against humanity, are an abomination
and a negation of Islam’s tenets.
READ MORE: Tunisia holds vigil for horrific beach massacre victims (PHOTOS)
As hatred and fear are fast replacing reason and logic, it is
time we all learn of the roots and driving forces behind this
monstrosity - Wahhabism. If indeed our goal is to eradicate
terror, we might want to start where it is bred, instead of
appointing blame where it is not warranted.
This Islam the world has come to loathe is in fact a perversion,
which was born in the desert of Nejd in Saudi Arabia back in the
18th century. This ideology Muslims and non-Muslims alike have to
come to fear and despise is but an engineered religious deviance
rooted in hatred.
Wahhabism is merely the misguided expression of one man’s
political ambition - Mohammed Abdel-Wahhab, a bigot who was
recruited by the British Empire to erode the fabric of Islam and
crack the armor of the then-Ottoman Empire by breeding
sectarianism and dissent. It is Abdel-Wahhab's alliance to the
House of Saud that ultimately unleashed this now seemingly
unstoppable evil we know today under the tag of Islamic
radicalism.
If not for the Al Saud Royals' billions and the silence of
Western powers, Wahhabism would never have crossed the deserts of
Saudi Arabia. If not for the kingdom's lavish sponsoring of the
Wahhabi school of thought, extremism would never have come to be
in the first place.
Although exact numbers are not known, it is thought that Saudi
Arabia has spent over $100 billion on exporting fanatical
Wahhabism to various, much poorer Muslim nations worldwide over
the past three decades, notwithstanding its efforts in the West.
Islamic State’s obscene savagery epitomizes the violence inherent
and central to Wahhabism and Salafism, its other radical branch.
Let us all remember how eagerly the kingdom carries out death
sentences by beheading or stoning and how generously its
officials hand out lashings and other barbaric corporal
punishments to its citizens before theorizing on the source of
Islamic State’s murderous streak.
IS is simply a studious disciple of Wahhabism. It learned its
craft and its hate within its schools; it was force-fed its
poison by a clergy which idolizes death and torture in the name
of a misplaced and misguided understanding of what constitutes
the holy. Ascetic, reactionary, murderous and cruel, Wahhabism is
a terror that needs to be named before it can be defeated.
READ MORE: Fatal Friday: Scores dead after France, Tunisia & Kuwait hit by terrorist attacks
More than any other people and religious community, Muslims have
suffered as a consequence of the pain and suffering IS has
inflicted. Naturally, they do not recognize this evil as having
anything to do with their faith. And yet, Muslims continue to be
blamed for the misery these Wahhabi legions wreak on the world.
Would it not be better to admit that Wahhabism is not of Islam
and thus free over a billion people from carrying such a
collective burden of guilt?
Ultimately, however drastic our security measures or violent our
military interventions will be against radicals, it will all come
to naught if we continue to allow Wahhabis to spew their poison
through religious patronage?
Terror will only end with the death of its ideology.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.