Washington votes against GMO labeling – preliminary results
The citizens of Washington State have voted against a bill that would have required the labeling of genetically altered foods, according to preliminary ballot results.
Tuesday’s ballots saw 35 counties out of 39 vote against the legislation backed by environmentalists. Counties Whatcom, King, Jefferson and San Juan were the only ones to vote for the labeling of GMO products.
The current figures are based on preliminary results, with confirmation expected by Friday. Washingtonians vote by absentee ballot which means the authorities will accept any ballot marked with November 5.
Supporters of the bill were severely outgunned in the campaign
faced by corporate opposition from the likes of Monsanto, Pepsi
and Nestle.
The multinationals invested a total of $22 million in convincing
the state’s constituents they should vote against the mandatory
labeling of foods with genetically modified ingredients.
The legislation’s advocates could do little to compete with the
multinationals, raising only $8.4 million. They believed that if
the legislation were approved in Washington, then other States in
the US would follow suit. Currently around 70 percent of
processed foods in America are made using genetically modified
ingredients like sugar beets, soy, and corn.
Connecticut made history this June by becoming the first state to
require the labeling of foods that had been genetically
altered.
The bill, also known as Initiative 522 (I522), would have obliged
companies that produce genetically modified food to label their
products as such. The legislation was to come into effect in
2015.
A survey carried out in early September by Politico indicated
early support for the bill with 66 percent of Washingtonians
approving of the legislation. However, by October support had
declined significantly, to 46 percent, after the bill’s corporate
opposition poured millions into a media campaign.
This is not the first time tech giants have rallied against
legislation that would have forced them to label their
genetically altered produce. In 2012 a similar bill was struck
down in California after a $45 million campaign by Monsanto and
its cohorts.
Proposition 37 was aimed to “enforce the fundamental right of
the people of California to be fully informed about whether the
food they purchase and eat is genetically engineered and not
misbranded as natural.”